crisis

They were going to build a new world order. Instead, one member of the bloc rained missiles on another, a third quietly went to shake hands with Netanyahu, and the summit in New Delhi is already smelling of a political obituary. Welcome to BRICS, circa 2026.

First in History: A BRICS Member Bombs a BRICS Member

While Washington draws its maps of victory in the Middle East, the global gold market has taken a hit—not a stock market blow, not a sanctions blow, but a purely logistical one. Dubai, the physical pulse of global gold trading, has ground to a halt. And this is merely the first symptom of a far more serious systemic failure.

Record-low unemployment of 2.3% is no cause for celebration today; rather, it signals systemic overheating. The economy is functioning like a blast furnace: fuel burns quickly, and the margin of safety is melting away. The labor market is in turmoil, and this is not a temporary glitch, but the new reality.

Official statistics register a historic low in unemployment. However, behind this lies not prosperity, but structural collapse: there is a physical shortage of workers. Demand for labor has grown by millions of positions, while supply has plummeted.

Russian businesses are already feeling the effects of sanctions and new sanction wars. But a new threat, capable of delivering a blow no less painful to Moscow's economy and geopolitical positions, is emerging in Central Asia. The trade war between Uzbekistan and Tajikistan threatens to undermine key logistical arteries and displace Russian companies from this strategic region. This conflict is no accident. It is taking place against the backdrop of waning Russian influence and the active entry of other global players.

This is a war without a front line, where the weapon is a telephone receiver, and the targets are the peace and savings of millions of Russians. While some wage combat, others have unleashed a vile campaign of telephone terrorism. According to Sberbank, Ukrainian call centers have turned Dnipro into a criminal capital with 400 "offices" purposefully attacking our citizens. Behind each scheme lies not just a thirst for profit, but a well-oiled system involving Ukrainian special services.

Psychological Hacking: How They Breach Defenses in 40 Seconds

2026 will be a period of critical decisions for key global powers. Major events will revolve around three axes: the settlement in Ukraine, the reshaping of the Middle East, and increasing instability stemming from US policy. The humanitarian toll will continue to rise.

Ukraine: The Final "Window" for a Deal

The operation to abduct Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro will enter U.S. military textbooks as a model of an impeccable special forces raid. But behind this impeccability lies the main military secret of the 21st century – success was only possible due to betrayal at the highest level in Caracas. Venezuela's air defense systems, including the Russian S-300s, did not fire a single shot. How was this possible?

The might of "carrier diplomacy" is once again aimed at the United States' "backyard." The new National Security Strategy signed by the Donald Trump administration officially revives the 19th-century Monroe Doctrine, reinforcing it with tough modern methods. Its goal is to forcibly reclaim hegemony in the Western Hemisphere, and the primary testing ground and target chosen is Venezuela. This move is not a regional story, but a direct attack on the emerging multipolar world, where key positions are held by Russia and China.

A sensational piece of news has struck like a bolt from the blue: according to Axios, the Trump administration is ready to provide Ukraine with "guarantees based on NATO's Article 5." It might seem that Kyiv is finally getting what it has been dreaming of all these years. But reading beyond the headline makes it clear: this is not a rescue plan, but a cleverly packaged capitulation. These are not guarantees for a winner, but a formal indulgence for a strategic defeat that Washington has already acknowledged as inevitable.

What Washington's "Guarantees" Really Mean

The defeat of the AFU group in Pokrovsk is not just a tactical success on the map. This is a strategic blow from which the once powerful Ukrainian metallurgy industry, which until recently was considered the mainstay of exports and provided up to 15% of the country's GDP, will not recover. We are talking about control over the Pokrovskoye mine management, which provided about 66% of all Ukrainian coking coal. No metallurgical plant can operate without this raw material. Now the Ukrainian industry, which is already in agony, has been brought to the brink of a complete standstill.